Media Wonk




User Profile

Paul Sweeting

Paul Sweeting is the editor of ContentAgenda.com and a columnist for Video Business. He has covered the home entertainment industries since 1985 for Billboard, Variety, Publishers Weekly and other leading business publications. He is based in Washington, DC.


User Stats

  • Recent Posts: 11
  • Avg Posts Per Week: 4
  • Posts Written: 397

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Hot Topic

Blog

Paul Sweeting

Paul Sweeting, Editor
ContentAgenda

Link This | Email this | Comments (3)


Irrational exuberance over Netflix? - May 20, 2008

Shares of Netflix took off like Diet Coke in a barrel full of Mentos this morning as news broke of a new set-top box from Roku that lets subscribers stream movies from their Netflix Instant viewing queue to their TV set. By mid-morning, shares were up more than 10% and volume was on a pace to match an average day's trading by lunch time. Lehman Brothers analyst Douglas Anmuth upgraded the stock from "equal weight" to "overweight."

Apparently, the market read the news as a sign that Netflix was making the jump to light speed at last and would soon be beaming movies around the Internet instead of mailing out those musty old DVDs in the flimsy red envelopes.

Not so fast. Media Wonk has had an opportunity to play around with one of the new Roku boxes for about a week and can report that it's a nice first step but the journey ahead is still a very long one.

The five-inch by five-inch box is easy to set up. Media Wonk used his wireless home network to connect it to the Internet and plugged it into the TV via composite video because he didn't have an HDMI cable handy. Piece of cake. Picture quality on a 42-inch Toshiba LCD was adequate if not spectacular. Playback was mostly smooth with an occasional hiccup but nothing worse than what Media Wonk sometimes sees with a VOD movie over Comcast.

The problem--as always--is there ain't much to watch with it. Only about one-tenth of Netflix's vast library is available for streaming thanks to the studios' niggardly approach to licensing, and most of what is falls into the strictly-from-hunger category.

That's not Netflix's fault. But it should put the Roku announcement into some kind of perspective. The Roku player solves the technical problem of getting streamed content from the PC to the TV, and it does it in an inexpensive, simple-to-use way. But the real challenge facing Netflix is not technical. It's a lack of rights. And the Roku box does nothing to change it.

More to the point: The biggest issue that should concern Netflix shareholders with respect to digital delivery--as with Blockbuster shareholders, Vudu investors and Apple acolytes--is that Netflix has no control over the most important variable in its digital business model beyond pleading with the studios. No amount of execution, strategic planning or balance-sheet finagling by Netflix will affect the rate of growth of its digital distribution business. The rights will come when they come. And when they do, everyone will get them. There's simply no way of knowing at this point when investors might see a return from Netflix's digital business.

Netflix, in fact, isn't even really trying to monetize what Roku has wrought at this point, at least not directly (unless, perhaps, it's getting a commission on the boxes sold through the Netflix web site). A subscriber with a $9.95 a month Netflix account can buy a Roku player and stream as many movies as they want at no extra charge. At best, it's an anti-churn tool, which might have some marginal impact on subscriber acquisition costs.

All of which amounts to a perfectly reasonable first step for Netflix. But it's a baby step to be sure.



[Deals & Dealmakers]  [Digital Home]  [E-Content]  [Streams & Downloads]   LEAVE A COMMENT
POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Bloggers Login Here.

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


livyatan
May 20, 2008
Response to:
Irrational exuberance over Netflix?

Not sure what you're smoking. I've been using the streaming service on my PC almost weekly and still have over a hundred movies on my queue that are "Instant viewable." Now that there's a way to get those moves to my HDTV, it does make a huge difference. I've gotten used to streaming all my digital files to my TV through my Xbox 360 (using Connect 360 on my mac and Tversity on my PC), and now this Roku player brings Netflix's library to the same place for $100. You're trying to view this as a "Is the technology the best it could be?" issue, when it's actually a "Netflix to TV solution for $100." That's one zero zero, the price of going to the theater 3 times. It's not the $400 of an iPod that would make people will think twice about buying it. At $100, even if I end up watching only 50 movies it's not only worth it, it's a bargain. Then there's the fact that Netflix's "Instant" listing has a hefty TV show library. Goodbye cable service.




psweeting
May 20, 2008
Response to:
Irrational exuberance over Netflix?

Actually, I wasn't viewing it in terms of the technology at all. I was viewing it in terms of whether the Roku player's foreseeable impact on Netflix's earnings justifies the valuation being assigned to it by investors. Someday, perhaps, streaming digital content to the TV will have a material impact on Netflix's business. My point was that getting to that day is not fundamentally a technical problem. It's a question of rights and business models, and the Roku player, nifty as it is, does nothing to change that.




livyatan
May 21, 2008
Response to:
Irrational exuberance over Netflix?

I think I understand what you mean. I think that investors are reacting more to gains in Netflix's market share of the home video market rather than an increase in spending from its current subscribers. It's partly perception, though is it not reasonable to figure many people will look at a subscription model for movies to their TV and buck the competition? I believe that small shift IS a deal maker for many people who haven't been sold yet.