Paul Sweeting is the editor of ContentAgenda.com and a columnist for Video Business. He has covered the home entertainment industries since 1985 for Billboard, Variety, Publishers Weekly and other leading business publications. He is based in Washington, DC.
1. Wal-Mart’s movie download service was not happening. The fact that nobody noticed for three day that it had been shut down tells you all you need to know about its popularity. The fact that the studios would be willing to write off Wal-Mart’s efforts without a peep confirms it.More in future posts.
2. The DVD business is seriously sucking wind. Wal-Mart had previously taken a dim view of studio efforts to promote the download business in ways that might have undercut its DVD sales. Fear of Wal-Mart kept individual studios from offering would-be download services the sort of pricing terms and release windows that could make digital delivery competitive with DVDs. It wasn’t until Wal-Mart got into the business itself, and could price-protect its DVD sales, that the studios were willing to move the window. As DVD sales soften, however, so too does Wal-Mart’s stick (so to speak). From Media Wonk’s conversations with studio executives, fourth-quarter sales trends were eye-opening, and not in a good way. Given the studios’ well-founded fears of getting in bed with Jobs, I doubt they’d be picking Apple over Wal-Mart if they were feeling more confident about the DVD business.
3. It’s very hard to build a new business that cannibalizes your existing business without cannibalizing your existing business. Even for Wal-Mart, trying to build a download business to protect your DVD business gets you neither.
4. The download business requires portability. At least for now it does, anyway, unless and until in-home burning of downloaded movies becomes popular. And portability means iPods. Reaching consumers on the iPod’s, of course, also means going through iTunes, with its proprietary DRM system, FairPlay. Wal-Mart knows there is no way on God’s green Earth that Apple will ever license it to use FairPlay, which means it is forever cut off from the iPod, unless the studios were somehow to permit downloads without DRM, which ain’t gonna to happen. Wal-Mart also no doubt understood that there is little the studios can do about that state of affairs, and that even all its DVD market share couldn’t realistically keep them out of Apple’s arms forever without a better download offering of its own to promise them. The studios clearly realize they can’t wait forever for a viable competitor to the iPod to emerge, and Wal-Mart knows it.
5. Portability means rentals. The studios have long been wary of a rental market for downloads out of fear that DRM hackers would quickly figure out how to retrieve permanent, high-quality copies for the price of a rental. They would clearly prefer to restrict rentals to streaming platforms, that don’t leave permanent copies behind, reserving downloads for electronic sell-through purposes. But streaming is a problem with portable devices because of slow, unreliable wireless networks, and the limited storage capability of most portable devices rules out e-sell-through. Presumably, the studios have extracted commitments from Apple for the vigorous policing and updating of FairPlay as the inevitable hacks occur.
6. Once again, Apple has managed to deflect attention from the Consumer Electronics Show it does not attend, to the Macworld conference it hosts a week later.
Nicely done. Any comments on: 1. Apple providing FairPlay-encoded files for inclusion on DVDs? 2. Impact on the living-room AppleTV and sales of DVDs?
"The download business requires portability." Precisely. please explain this to the idiots over at Amazon (Unbox) before they blow too much more money? Or not. It might entertain me to watch UnBox go down in flames. Along with XBox.
In a frenzy to catch up with Apple, the industry hasn’t learned much from the PlaysForSure debacle by watching Microsoft abandon its own DRM and introduce Zune with a new and incompatible system to compete directly against its erstwhile digital music “partners.” In another instance of mortgaging success to others’ willingness or ability to innovate, AOL recently moved its struggling video service to Amazon Unbox which in turn is based on Microsoft’s PlaysForSure. The irony here is that Wal-Mart relied on HP that relied on Microsoft and AOL relies on Amazon that relies on Microsoft which itself no longer relies on its own PlaysForSure. When a core component of a product or service depends on the rate of innovation of another party over which you have no control or influence, it’s time to rethink strategy. It’s also time to ask yourself, twice or thrice removed from core competency, should you really be in such a business? Strategic design risks (1): Wal-Mart’s foolhardy reliance on “partners” counternotions.com/2007/12/28/walmart-video/
Why are we pretending that the contents of ANY CD or DVD cannot be found in a high quality format with no DRM whatsoever? There is no business case for giving paying customers DRM hobbled versions of your products while criminals get fully working DRM free versions.
Paul, I agree with your analysis for the most part, but I gotta say I don't understand the comparison between video on iPod/iPhone to DVDs. Surely the announcement at Macworld will be about HD rentals (720p) for use on Apple TV. Yes of course they'll continue with iPod/iPhone compatible video (TV Shows, movies). But in terms of competing with DVDs, it's got to be HD, n'est pas?
Mark, It's probably not a coincidence that Fox is the first studio (apparently) to have reached a deal with Apple. The studio has made clear its interest in including digital copies on DVDs for transfer to a portable device, and it certainly knows that it needs to get to the iPod for that feature to have any sort of mass market appeal. So I would expect to see FairPlay-encrypted digital copies on DVDs fairly soon, at least from Fox. As for the impact on Apple TV, I think Mike W (see below) has a point. It would not be surprising to see 720p downloads to Apple TV devices be part of the announcement next week. But Mike, I think the studios see portability as the real upside here for them. They might give Jobs what he wants for Apple TV as the price for getting to the iPod, but the Internet-connected set-top box market right now is still way too fragmented to offer a lot of upside for the studios in the near term. PS